Plaintiff Cindy Carol Gregory swears under oath in deposition that she had no contact with Broward Sheriff's Detective John Berrena (area in yellow), so how did he end up with property from her that he withheld for 2-1/2 years until after this trial........

SHE ALSO ADMITS THAT PLAINTIFFS HACKED INTO DEFENDANT'S COMPUTER, AND STOLE A PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION TO AN ATTORNEY on page 125, lines 15 through 19 (area in red), 

and that her attorney, MARC A. CHANDLER, TAMPERED WITH EVIDENCE (the "evidence" he presented and Gregory identified was printed 3 hours AFTER it was supposedly taken into police custody - area in green).

For a libel case such as the plaintiffs alleged, the plaintiffs cannot supply their own evidence - it must be discovered by someone else  ... but the Defendant discovered that Plaintiff's 16 yr old Hacker was out of state.  Therefore, plaintiff's admission of hacking (Gregory Deposition: page 125, lines 18 & 19) indicate WIRETAPPING BY PLAINTIFFS, "Fraud Upon the Court" by attorney Marc A. Chandler, an officer of the court, who willfully and maliciously took part in this SCHEME to SWINDLE the Defendant, and joined the Plaintiffs in "Tampering With Evidence," [Gregory Deposition: p 125; 5-8]. 

You can't submit evidence to the court that was printed at 10 pm, but was given to the Broward Sheriff's Office at 6:30 pm the same day, especially when your 16 yr old key witness also states in deposition that he printed it at 10 pm!  This is another reason the Complaint was withheld from the Defendant, along with other documents.

Please note:  The Defendant's attorneys, John A. Brekka and Lee H. Schillinger, were working for the Plaintiff, and participated willingly in the plaintiff's scheme.  These attorneys solicited the unsuspecting defendant by telephone.