At the height of Attorney David J. Stern's foreclosure empire, he owned a $14 million mansion, a $7 million condo, multiple Ferraris and Porsches, and a 130-foot, $20 million yacht. His DJSP Enterprises employed 1,200 people, and netted him tens of millions of dollars. It all ended last year after accusations that his firm broke federal laws and ignored rules. Many of the 100,000 clients who paid 10 of millions of dollars to Stern were left high and dry without legal representation. Stern took up law classes full time after he was kicked out of his job as a high-school soccer coach by State of Texas sports officials. Stern has gone into hiding as of May, 2011.
In 1992, obtained the services of the Law Offices
Since 1997, I have repeatedly been told by Davie Florida Police officers and the Broward Sheriff's Office that this computer intrusion was a civil matter, and have been refused when I requested to make a Criminal Report of this and other related incidents. Our family, especially our children, continue to suffer the consequences.
In 1997, Scott Kevin Bagwell, Cindy Carol Gregory, and Robert Thomas Newton Jr. (a 16 year old juvenile at that time) hacked into my business Internet Server, and intercepted by means of an electronic device, a modem, (wiretapping) a stored "timeline" written by LLoyd W. Phillips to an attorney, commonly referred to as "email."Instead of serving me, they served an attorney they knew. This attorney, Lee H. Schillinger, solicited me by telephone. I had no contract with this man.
Instead of being prosecuted, Scott Bagwell and Cindy Carol Gregory, against 18 USC 2515 and 47 U.S.C. 605, unlawfully entered this intercepted timeline as evidence in a defamation case.
The judge did not appear to have jurisdiction in this case.The judge's actions resulted in Plaintiffs Scott Kevin Bagwell and Cindy Carol Gregory continuing to stalk the Defendant and his family for 9 years. A single paragraph from the Plaintiffs notarized letter from the Plaintiffs to the Defendants in 1997 is a partial insight of the stalking of the Defendants by the Plaintiffs:
They later attempted to run their victim down with their car. Their victim was a Confidential Informant against them.
xxx
JUDITH HERSKOWITZ's statement sums up this case:
How can the United States represent itself as a beacon of justice, democracy, freedom and human rights when the American dream of success can be turned into the American nightmare by the misuse of the judicial system. How can this be a system of justice where a lawsuit can be based on the fabrication of a crafty lawyer to confiscate property, with judges willing to orchestrate it with orders and judgments, on pretense of law, to end up as fees for lawyers. more
------------- 17th JUDICIAL COURT, CASE 97-13631 CACE (18) -------------
According to Judge Herbert Moriarity, the Defendant was NOT represented by counsel click here.
Incompetent Counsel for the Defendant, Attorney LEE H. SCHILLINGER of Hollywood, Florida, had no contract with the client he allegedly represented. Stay clear of this incompetent attorney who unlawfully accepted service, then called the defendant, and solicited him by telephone. TO FURTHER COVER HIS TRACKS, ATTORNEY LEE H. SCHILLINGER REFUSED TO FILE AN APPEAL.
I am an FBI CI in an investigation involving the Plaintiff, Scott Kevin Bagwell. Attorney Lee H. Shillinger hid this fact from the court.
Scott Kevin Bagwell continues to stalk our family. Bagwell knows the consequences of making false reports to the Child Abuse Hotline AND the Davie Florida Police Department, but does so anyway. Bagwell is aware of the pain and suffering he causes to an innocent family. Mr. Bagwell's stalking of a minor elevates his offense to a felony per Attorney Neil Miller, of the Institute for Law and Justice, a consultant to the State Of Florida. Since Bagwell's aggravated stalking of a minor resulted in harm to the children he stalked, as documented by Broward County's CDTC, thus this felony is elevated to the next level.
According to court transcripts, former neighbors, and Child Protective Investigator Jeff Fisher, Scott Kevin Bagwell is no stranger to DCF and HRS. Scott Kevin Bagwell was reportedly forced to move from his former Whale Harbor Address because of reports of child abuse against him, according to Social worker Jeff Fisher in an in-depth interview.
Stalker Scott Kevin Bagwell exceeded authorization, hacked the Defendant's internet Server and intercepted email from the Defendant to his attorney, attorney Kenneth Hemmerle.
Bagwell then unlawfully used this intercepted, stolen Intellectual Property in a defamation case against the FBI CI against him.
The Defendant learned of the defamation suit through a phone solicitation by attorney Lee H. Schillinger. The Defendant was never legally served, and the Defendant NEVER had a contract with attorney Schillinger. The judge had to interrupt the trial to chastise both attorneys, stating that 'never in a million years had he seen such a disjointed trial by such unprepared attorneys.'
HACKER / Stalker / Plaintiff Scott K. Bagwell waving hello to the Defendant and his children.
-------------------------------------------------
STALKERS WIN CASE WITH PERJURED TESTIMONY, AIDED AND ABETTED BY ATTORNEY MARC A. CHANDLER.
STALKING TIMELINE BY PLAINTIFFS AGAINST DEFENDANTS, all of which was withheld during trial (Evidence Tampering):
1995: Approached at my home by two U.S. Marshals regarding neighbors at 14200 SW 29th Court, Davie, Florida.
Jan. 1996: 14200 property broken into while neighbors away. Davie police reported that phone and electric wires were cut, but nothing stolen.
JAN 1996: Selma Quintero, husband "JC", and children, never stayed at 14200 property again, and immediately moved to house in Weston, Florida, listed under a different name.
Feb 1996: Cooperated with FBI CID Agent Warren Martin. Wife found drugs while house-sitting at 14200 property. Three shopping bags and one box full of banded US currency of various denominations were brought to the 14200 property by 2 unknown males with wife present.
Mar 1996: Continued cooperating with FBI. FBI Agent Martin frequently called wife to identify people and vehicles at/entering/leaving Quintero's new Weston property.
Mar 1996: Activity at 14200 property. Asked to by FBI Agent Warren Martin to photograph subjects at 14200 property. Identified the husband of Selma Quintero, "JC" from photo provided to FBI by District 2, DEA agent Ken McCarron, from a photograph I supplied to FBI. Selma Quintero had unknowingly moved to Weston just blocks away from CID FBI Agent Warren Martin, the same FBI Agent who was investigating her and her deported Columbian husband pictured below at the 14200 property. The deported husband was not suppose to be in this country.
Sept 1996: "for sale" sign erected on adjacent 14200 property. Contacted Attorney Ken Hemmerly to handle encroachments and code violations at adjacent 14200 property, since Town of Davie stated "it was a civil matter."
Oct 1996: A Coldwell Banker Realtor came to my home with Ms. Cindy Carol Gregory, and requested information about the adjacent 14200 property. I told them I had contacted an attorney to have "JC" and his wife, Selma Quintero, fix the problems with the property, including flooding.
Nov 1996: Even though Quintero had lived in Weston Florida for 11 months, within blocks of FBI CID Agent Warren Martin, I was served with a Restraining Order for "Repeat Domestic Violence" to allow the sale of the 14200 property to go through without having to correct code violations. The buyers, Scott K. (Bagwell and his girlfriend, Cindy Carol Gregory, admit prior knowledge in 1998 depositions, and conspired together with Quintero and other Coldwell Banker agents and Selma Quintero in this fraudulent Restraining Order.)
Nov 1996: Selma Quintero, a Coldwell Banker Realtor who has four children by her deported alien husband "JC", committed fraud by executing a deed as a "single woman" on the sale of the 14200 property.
Davie Florida Police refuse to take report.
Broward Sheriff's Office refuse to take report, including perjury.
After the fraudulent RO and unlawful transfer of the 14200 property to Scott K. Bagwell, Selma Quintero further harassed us by using our address and having a post-card sent to us in her name.
Nov 1996: Scott Kevin Bagwell moved into the adjacent 14200 property with his girlfriend, the wife of his brother, and her 2 children.
Dec 31, 1996: We caught Bagwell and a male friend (holding a flashlight) lowering a young boy into our yard on a ladder.
Jan 1997: After my wife and I left Bagwell's house, we heard Bagwell's girlfriend say: "She's soap box ugly, and he's a child molester." Gregory later had her realtor friend, Yvonne Fazio, call us and say there was a misunderstanding.
Feb 1997: Bagwell threatened to "take care of those f**kin dogs." (Our dogs)
Feb 1997: One of our dogs was poisoned. (per Griffin Road Animal Hospital.)
March 20, 1997: Caught Bagwell's girlfriend, Cindy Carol Gregory, making crank hang-up calls to our home - picture below
April 8, 1997: Saw Bagwell going towards our house as we turned the corner. Turned car around and saw him near our mailbox. Our mailbox is about 50' from his property line.
April 9, 1997: Found garden hose cut into pieces
April 12, 1997: Bagwell and friends would sit on peak of their roof closest to our bedroom and bathroom windows, and whistle at my wife
April 15, 1997: Replaced motion sensor floodlights with longer range model.
April 16, 1997: Found the car antenna had been broken
April 18,1997: Found Bagwell had withheld wife's mail from DMV. admitted it in 1998 deposition.
April 26, 1997: Billing address on wife's credit card changed to vacant lot.
June 5, 1997: Party called to say they had not received mail I sent on 3-25-1997.
Early Summer, 1997: Bagwell installed a camera aimed at our house.
(May, 2006, TV Camera still aimed at our bedroom, bathroom, and yard.)
Plaintiffs and juvenile hacker friend Robert Thomas Newton Jr broke into the Defendant's online server and intercepted a communication from the defendant to his attorney, Ken Hemmerle. Plaintiffs then used this attorney-client privileged timeline intercepted by wiretap in a court of law against the defendants, who were solicited by phone by attorney LEE H. SCHILLINGER, whom the plaintiffs' attorney served. The Defendants were never properly served, nor signed a contract with the incompetant attorney LEE H. SCHILLINGER..
Atty rick lambert: equity land title - letter, sign
American Legal System Is "Corrupt Beyond Recognition," Judge Tells Harvard Law School
The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition, Judge Edith Jones of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, told the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School on February 28.
She said that the question of what is morally right is routinely sacrificed to what is politically expedient. The change has come because legal philosophy has descended to nihilism. ...more
Judge Edith H. Jones of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit talks to members of Harvard Law School's Federalist Society. Jones said that the question of what is morally right is routinely sacrificed to what is politically expedient. Recent News
SOUTH DAKOTA TO VOTE ON PUTTING JUDGES ON TRIAL
Statewide Initiative Would Allow Citizens to Sue Judges
click here
17th JUDICIAL COURT, CASE 97-13631 CACE (18)
Introduction
Mr. LLoyd W. Phillips and his wife were FBI Informants / Witnesses against Mr. Scott Kevin Bagwell and the former owners of the Bagwell property. This information was withheld at the request of FBI CID Agent Warren Martin.
Robert Thomas Newton Jr., a minor, was deposed by Attorney Mark Grossman, of the Law Firm of Becker and Poliakoff, in the fall of 1998. In this deposition, Robert Thomas Newton Jr. stated under oath that Plaintiff Scott Kevin Bagwell’s live-in girlfriend, Cindy Carol Gregory, an adult, solicited and conspired with the 16 year old minor on the morning of August 15, 1997, to:
1. unlawfully access a protected computer internet business website belonging to Mr. LLoyd W. Phillips by wire
2. unlawfully exceed authorized access
3. unlawfully access[1] a private, digitally stored communication/Intellectual Property, not available to the general public
4. unlawfully access a client-attorney privileged communication to attorney Kenneth Hemmerle
5. unlawfully intercept[2] a private, digitally stored communication/Intellectual Property, not available to the general public by wire (wiretapping)
6. unlawfully intercept a client-attorney privileged communication/Intellectual Property to attorney Kenneth Hemmerle by wire (wiretapping)
7. steal Intellectual Property
8. copy Intellectual Property
9. publish stolen Intellectual Property
10. distribute stolen Intellectual Property
[1] "Access" means being able to acquire communications contents; "intercept" means actually doing so (by means of a device). Smith, 155 F.3d at 1058.
Thus, Smith noted that Title II's prohibition on unauthorized access might have been violated by making unauthorized use of a password and "roaming about" the voicemail system without intercepting message "contents," but that once Smith's message was "retrieved and recorded," the line between Title II and Title I had been crossed and an "interception" occurred. Ibid.
[2] "Intercept" means actually acquiring communications contents (by means of a device). Smith, 155 F.3d at 1058.
Thus, Smith noted that Title II's prohibition on unauthorized access might have been violated by making unauthorized use of a password and "roaming about" the voicemail system without intercepting message "contents," but that once Smith's message was "retrieved and recorded," the line between Title II and Title I had been crossed and an "interception" occurred. Ibid.
The Complaint
Libel, Publishing, Pain and Suffering, and an alleged obscene gesture, the same one we continually receive from plaintiffs. Plaintiff Cindy Carol Gregory stated in deposition that my wife should be sued for this alleged act, which caused her great pain and suffering.
HACKER / Stalker / Plaintiff Scott K. BagwellThe Trial
ATTORNEY GENERAL JANET RENO PROSECUTED A 16 yr OLD HACKER IN MIAMI, FLORIDA (click here), AND HE WAS SENTENCED TO SIX MONTHS IN PRISON.
IN FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA, THE INCOMPETENT JUDGE HERBERT MORIARITY ACKNOWLEDGED "INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNCIL" AND 6th AMENDMENT VIOLATIONS ON THE RECORD, AFTER SENDING THE JURY OUT OF THE COURTROOM (PARTIALITY, TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE and JURY TAMPERING by JUDGE HERBERT MORIARITY). THE JUDGE THEN ORDERED THE TRIAL TO CONTINUE. (Don't you just love "Judicial Immunity"?)
JUDGE MORIARITY THEN ORDERED BOTH ATTORNEYS TO BREAK THE HEARSAY RULE - click here for transcript.
JUDGE HERBERT MORIRITY FURTHER VIOLATED FLORIDA STATUTE (FSS §934.06) AND FEDERAL LAW (18 USC §2515) BY ALLOWING A STORED, PASSWORD PROTECTED, COPYRIGHTED COMMUNICATION FROM A CLIENT TO HIS ATTORNEY, HACKED (WIRETAPPING) FROM AN INTERNET SERVER by 16 yr old ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr and THE PLAINTIFFS, SCOTT KEVIN BAGWELL AND CINDY CAROL GREGORY, FROM A HIDDEN INTERNET SUBDIRECTORY ON A PROTECTED COMPUTER, NOT AVAILABLE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC, TO BE USED AS "EVIDENCE."
The plaintiffs and their witnesses, including Robert Newton (a minor), should have been arrested and charged with a SECOND DEGREE FELONY as provide for in FSS 815.04(4)(b). Instead, the incompetent Judge Herbert Moriarity, who had already acknowledged Ineffective Assistance Of Council on the record (click here), an admission by the Court that the Defendant's 6th Amendment Rights were being violated, ordered the trial to continue. Judge Herbert Moriarity then monetarily rewarded the Plaintiffs and all Lawyers for their scheme.
After reading the verdict, the judge commented: "IF he is guilty."
The fact that the Defendants were Federal Witnesses/Informants against the Plaintiffs was also concealed by attorney Lee H. Schillinger, a disgrace to his profession (Evidence Tampering).
CLICK ABOVE TO READ THE FULL TEXT ON THE FBI'S CYBERCRIME WEBSITE.
Thanks to the corrupt Judge Herbert Moriarity, the Plaintiffs and all attorneys unlawfully profited from their crime against the Defendants.
Plaintiff Scott Kevin Bagwell waiving hello to Defendants.
Plaintiffs claimed we made this gesture to them, and were awarded punitive damages for "PAIN & SUFFERING"
Instead of being arrested for Hacking and serving time, Plaintiff's 16 yr old HACKER-KEY WITNESS Robert Thomas Newton Jr (who cut plaintiff's grass) was rewarded with Scuba Diving in plaintiff's pool.
The following Officers Of The Court have committed "Fraud Upon The Court":
Judge Herbert Moriarity, who acknowledged on the record that the defendants had Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, and that this was the "most unprepared trial" he had heard "in a million years" (click here for trial transcript). Judge Herbert Moriarity then ordered the trial to continue, knowing that the Defendants were INEFFECTIVELY represented, thus denying the defendants their right to a fair trial, a Right granted under the Sixth Amendment.
Perhaps the judge applied the "Rule of Necessity" - Thanksgiving was in 3 days, and it was necessary to for him to be out of town.
Attorney Marc A. Chandler - Who gave textbook thinly veiled instructions during depositions, orchestrated and was co-principle with the Plaintiffs in this fraud. Florida Attorney Marc A. Chandler 'got off' during deposition by asking about Defendant's sex life, and how he "did it" with his wife.
Attorney Lee H. Schillinger, who unlawfully solicited the defendants by telephone, ordering them to remove a subdirectory (simulation of legal process) put up for another attorney. This swindler attorney withheld threats (the voice you hear from plaintiff Scott K. Bagwell when this page is loaded), stalking by plaintiffs and their hired cameraman, hacking, evidence tampering, attempting to run us over with their car, the fact defendants were FBI Informants against Plaintiffs, trespass, and other acts by plaintiffs. Attorney Lee H. Schillinger had no clue about the computer law or rhe structure of the internet, and used the defendant as his own expert witness to keep his profit margin high. The defendant was NOT an expert in this field, a further violation of the defendant's 6th Amendment Rights.
Attorney John A. Brekka, a former partner of Lee H Schillinger
Attorney Steven Davis (Becker & Poliakoff)
Attorney Mark Grossman (Becker & Poliakoff), who withheld evidence from the court.
Chief Judge Dale Ross, who allowed these acts to happen in his courts, and continues to violate Judicial Canon by his silence.
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
Go directly to:
Attorney General Janet Reno did her job. Judge Dale Ross' Circuit did not. Who is to blame for this and other injustices that we know as "The Legal System?" JUDGES - Chief Judge Dale Ross, Judge Herbert Moriarity, and others. Judges are the ROOT, while LAWYERS are the branches of this weed of mass destruction. If Attorney General Janet Reno could find a knowledgeable judge in Dade County, what's wrong with Broward County? click here
That is why I support J.A.I.L. FOR JUDGES.
"When people fear the government, you have tyranny. When the government fears the people, you have liberty"
--Thomas Jefferson
Plaintiffs, friends of the corrupt Davie Florida Police, attempted to kill Defendant:
The Plaintiffs should have been arrested and put in jail for attempting to run over defendants with their vehicle, but their Davie Police friend concealed this act.
Instead, the plaintiffs hacked into the defendant's computer, and used the "system" to bring suit against the Government Informants against them.
Here is a blatant example of plaintiff's PERJURED deposition:
The plaintiffs then hacked into the Defendant's computer and stole a stored-in-transit, communication to an attorney, and unlawfully used this property stolen by wire (wiretap), against the Defendants.
This should have ended this action, but , corrupt lawyers like Marc A. Chandler prostituted himself throughout this mocker, and greedy Lee H. Schillinger kept this action going, while Judge Herbert Moriarity, refused to take Mandatory Judicial Notice, and broke rule after rule.
The following is a partial pictorial documentation of the Plaintiffs actions against the Defendants:
|
|
|
Plaintiffs
hired the person who installed their closed circuit TV cameras to follow
and record Defendants & voices on videotape |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Invasion Of Privacy:
Sitting on roof & whistling at |
|||
But it didn't end there:
Amoral attorney Lee H. Schillinger later stated he had an unlawful "Verbal Contingency Agreement." The same corrupt Judge Herbert Moriarity, the judge who stated on the record that these attorneys were ineffective, ruled that these attorneys had properly represented the Defendant, and that a contract existed!
Having successfully executed a FRAUD UPON THE COURT, amoral Plaintiff's attorney, Marc A. Chandler then demanded that Defendant bring Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein to justice:
This is justice in Judge Dale Ross' 17th Judicial Circuit Court
-------------------------------------
In addition, the Defendants, after being visited by U.S. Marshals, were Confidential Informants, and were being stalked by both the plaintiffs and the former owners of the adjacent property, Selma Quintero and her Colombian husband, the primary subjects of an FBI investigation.
FBI CID Agent Warren Martin, who the Defendants worked with, requested photos of Plaintiffs as visitors and buyers of the adjacent property. The defendants had previously identified owners of the adjacent property from photos provided by DEA Agent Ken McCarron, as a deported illegal alien, known by plaintiffs Scott Kevin Bagwell and Cindy Carol Gregory.
The Defendants requested but received no assistance from the FBI, who were aware of the retaliation against the Defendants/Confidential Informants. The defendants were told NOT to disclose anything discussed in private, and this mockery of a trial, together with the inaction of AMORAL attorneys John A. Brekka and Lee H. Schillinger, and Judge Herbert Moriarity, is the result. I will never trust the FBI again.
In an identical case, Attorney General Janet Reno jailed another 16 yr old in Miami for the same thing, shortly after this. She was a good attorney, and had an honest judge. That is why I now support J.A.I.L. for Judges.
The voice you hear threatening the Defendants is that of Plaintiff Scott K. Bagwell, but the videotape was purposefully withheld by Attorney Lee H. Schillinger.
Was a "jury of your peers" competent to see through this farce of a trial? Read this article if you have any doubts!
"America Online (AOL) has confirmed documents sold to Fox News that state 40% of its subscribers do NOT OWN COMPUTERS, as of September 30, 2004."
".... AOL was able to get away with this, apparently, because so many people are unclear as to what the internet is.... "
" .... We kept getting copies of the phone book, so I thought AOL was doing that. I also wanted the virus protection, because it was flu season."
The Defendants were FBI Informants against the Plaintiffs, and were instructed not to reveal this fact.
After stealing documents from Defendant's computer, Plaintiffs Scott K. Bagwell and Cindy Carol Gregory of 14220 SW 29 Court, Davie, Florida, fraudulently schemed and conspired with 16yr old hacker Robert Thomas Newton Jr., attorney Mark A. Chandler, and others, and brought suit for libel and defamation.
Defendant's amoral, unqualified attorneys, Lee H. Schillinger and John A. Brekka, unlawfully accepted service from Plaintiff by mail, then solicited Defendant by telephone. The Defendant had no contract with these attorneys.
At no time was the Defendant given the Complaint, denying him Sixth Amendment Rights.
Plaintiffs obtained all evidence by "exceeding authorization" by hacking into Defendant's Business Website, containing a subdirectory which can only be accessed with the proper 5-digit numerical sequence, not available to the general public (exculpatory information known by ALL attorneys, including the key witness's 2nd deposing attorney, Internet Guru, Mark Grossman, which constitutes a FRAUD UPON THE COURT - Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), and stealing Stored and In-Transit Communications to an attorney, retained by Defendant for another matter.
While Attorney General Janet Reno prosecuted and jailed a 16 yr old Miami hacker in an identical case (click here for FBI Press Release), the incompetent Judge Herbert Moriarity rewarded the Plaintiffs and their amoral attorney for their fraud and conspiracy.
Judge Herbert Moriarity acknowledged on the record (click here for actual trial transcript) that ALL the attorneys in this case were unprepared (Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel), then unlawfully ordered the trial to continue. JUDGE HERBERT MORIARITY VIOLATED THE DEFENDANT'S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO A LAWYER, AND THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL - see: Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law.
Judge Herbert Moriarity culpably violated State and Federal Rules Of Evidence, and refused to take Mandatory Judicial Notice.
The two paragraphs above, constitute textbook FRAUD UPON THE COURT by Judge Herbert Moriarity - Bulloch v. United States
EVIDENCE TAMPERING: Plaintiffs Scott K. Bagwell and Cindy Carol Gregory, attorneys Marc A. Chandler, Lee H. Schillinger, and John A. Brekka, and the Broward Sheriff's Office and the Davie Police Department, TAMPERED WITH WITNESSES AND/OR EVIDENCE. No original evidence was available during trial. It was removed by BSO Homicide Detective John Berrena, and returned after the trial.
The Defendant's attorneys should have immediately sought Civil Damages for WIRETAPPING: 18 U.S.C. 2520, plus STALKING, Conspiracy, Malicious Prosecution, et., but refused to do so when instructed.
All attorneys came before the Court with "UNCLEAN HANDS."
ATTORNEYS LEE H. SCHILLINGER AND JOHN A. BREKKA ALSO TAMPERED WITH EVIDENCE GATHERED BY ATTORNEY MARK GROSSMAN, OF THE LAW FIRM OF BECKER AND POLIAKOFF, FROM THE SECOND DEPOSITION OF ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr. This exculpatory deposition would have resulted in a loss of "privilege" for SUN-SENTINEL NEWSPAPER reporter, Jodi Needles, a principle instigator, who "trafficked in passwords" and "stirred up strife" in Plaintiff's fraudulent scheme.
The Defendants and their family, FBI informants/witnesses against the Plaintiffs, continue to be stalked by Plaintiffs with the auspices of Judge Dale Ross's 17th Judicial Circuit Court, including having the Defendant's car picked up at Christmas, after issuing a Satisfaction of Judgment. Both Davie Police and BSO refused to take a police report.
This is a case of violation of the Defendant's Fourth Amendment Rights, due to Officers of the Court denying the Defendant his Sixth Amendment Rights.
Days, Hours, Minutes Defendants continue to live in fear because of the Plaintiff's course of conduct, and with Deprivation of Rights Under Color Of Law, because of the licensing of "defective products" by the Florida Bar:
THE FACT THAT THIS SITE EXISTS UNCHALLENGED, IS TESTIMONY TO THE TRUTH.
____________________
IN CASE 97-13631 CACE (18) JUDGE HERBERT MORIARITY UNLAWFULLY AWARDED THOUSANDS IN COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, PLUS THOUSANDS MORE IN PUNITIVE DAMAGES TO PLAINTIFFS / STALKERS / HACKERS SCOTT BAGWELL AND CINDY CAROL GREGORY FOR THEIR FRAUDULENT SCHEME TO HAVE 16 YR OLD ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr. HACK INTO A BUSINESS WEBSITE, AND STEAL STORED and IN-TRANSIT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY and PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS FROM A CLIENT TO HIS ATTORNEY, THEN USE THIS HACKED, STOLEN, WIRETAP-GATHERED INFORMATION AS EVIDENCE IN A COURT OF LAW, AGAINST EXISTING STATE and FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE.
DETAILS:
Plaintiffs SCOTT KEVIN BAGWELL and CINDY CAROL GREGORY conspired (CRIMINAL SOLICITATION) and schemed 18 U.S.C. §1341 with 16 yr old ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr., his parents, MARY GODDARD and JEFFERY GODDARD, Attorney MARC. A. CHANDLER, and others, to hack into the Defendant's business website (a Government Witness/Informant against them), in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1030(a)(4) and 18 U.S.C. §2701(a)(2), and intercept the victim's private electronically stored Intellectual Property and privileged communication to his attorney, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2511(a). This HACKED , STOLEN PROPERTY OBTAINED BY WIRETAP CAN NOT BE USED AS EVIDENCE PER 18 U.S.C. §2515 AND FLORIDA STATE STATUTE §934.06.
The 16yr old admitted to being out of state, on vacation during part of this scheme, and Plaintiffs Bagwell and Gregory, with their attorney MARC A. CHANDLER present (attorney became co-conspirator), personally admitted stealing the Defendant's Intellectual Property in the 2nd deposition of Robert Thomas Newton, Jr. Plaintiff Cindy Carol Gregory admitted in deposition that plaintiffs also "hacked" into the Defendant's Business Internet Website, and personally stole part of this privileged communication. 18 U.S.C. §241
JUDGE HERBERT MORIARITY, knowing that the evidence against the defendant was "hacked" from his business website, refused to take MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE as required by FSS §90.201 (JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT), and allowed the Intellectual Property and Attorney-Client Privileged stolen property obtained by WIRETAP into evidence in violation of Federal Law 18 U.S.C. §2515 and State Law FSS §934.06. The Judge, himself, violated Federal Law, 18 USC §1512(a)(C). Judges are also included under "COLOR OF LAW," 18 USC §242, and thus can be prosecuted Civilly under 42 USC §1983. The communiqué to the attorney was stored on an internet server, and protected from public access by an alpha-numeric code.
The Defendants were FBI INFORMANTS/WITNESSES against the Plaintiffs and the former owners of the Plaintiff's house, a Deported Columbian Alien, and were working with FBI C.I.D. AGENT WARREN MARTIN. They were told NOT to disclose any conversation. The Defendant's attorney knew this.
The Defendant's attorneys, who were working for the Plaintiffs and who solicited the Defendants by telephone, and, further, had no contract with the defendants, should have immediately sought Civil Damages for WIRETAPPING: 18 U.S.C. 2520, STALKING, Conspiracy, Malicious Prosecution, et., but refused to do so when instructed. Furthermore, the Davie Florida Police Department refused to take ANY reports in this matter, CULPABLY stating it was NOT a criminal matter.
Plaintiff Scott Kevin Bagwell of DAVIE, Florida
Plaintiffs brought lawsuit against Mrs. Alexandra Phillips, alleging she made the above gesture to plaintiffs, which justified a cause for "pain and suffering."
Scott K. Bagwell and Attorney Marc A. Chandler's Role in 9-11IT IS THE DEFENDANTS WHO HAVE BEEN STALKED, THREATENED, BURGLARIZED, DEFAMED, EXTORTED, HAD THEIR DOGS DIE WITHIN MONTHS OF EACH OTHER, AND CONTINUE TO HAVE THEIR FAMILY STALKED, BECAUSE OF POLICE CORRUPTION AND CORRUPTION BY THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT
WHEN THE DEFENDANT'S CHILD WAS 2 WEEKS OLD, THE PLAINTIFFS FRAUDULENTLY AND MALICIOUSLY HAD THE DEFENDANT'S CAR PICKED UP AT CHRISTMAS, EVEN THOUGH THE PLAINTIFFS HAD FILED AND RECORDED A SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT. THIS GRAND THEFT WAS MADE POSSIBLE BY THE CULPABLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE CLERK OF THE COURT FOR THE 17 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT.
>>>>>>> THIS PRINTOUT IS STOLEN, COPYRIGHTED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY <<<<<<>
SCOTT BAGWELL PAID DAVIE POLICE, AND DAVIE POLICE LIEUTENANT MICHAEL ALLEN PROTECTED BAGWELL FROM ARREST.
How to STALK your defendant:
Scott K. Bagwell waves "hello" to victim and his family, especially when they have their toddler and infant with them.
Install and aim a video camera at victim's bedroom
Hire a photographer to follow (stalk) victim's family with a camcorder
Play VERY LOUD music over a 2-1/2 yr period, to interrupt their child's naps & sleep
Have photographer shoot victim's family in their own yard when they're outside
Make enough noise so victim has to board-up his child's bedroom window
Have friends climb on your roof with you at midnight, and whistle at victim's wife as she feeds their dogs
Call Child Protective Services, and say the victim's child is in danger from his 7 RABID Dobermans, then poison their dogs
Send your own child over your fence into your neighbor's yard, the yard with the alleged 7 vicious, RABID DOBERMANS.
Come out on your porch whenever you hear your victim's car start, and show off your "package" while giving his family the fingerAt a restraining order hearing against this Stalker, the Judge denied the Restraining Order, but said to "get it on videotape" ......so I did
| The application of FLORIDA STATE STATUTE 784.048(5) (Stalking of a minor under 16 years of age) to this case has been evaluated and confirmed applicable by Attorney Neal Miller J.D., (University of Pennsylvania), Principal Research Associate for the Institute For Law and Justice, Consultant to Federal, State (including Florida), and Local Governments and Agencies. Attorney Miller "Wrote The Book" on stalking, and personally wrote the ILJ's Final Report on Stalking. His forte includes 42 U.S.C. 1983 litigation. DAVIE PD WON'T TAKE A REPORT. |
In December 1997, Congress had passed the No Electronic Theft (“NET”) Act, making it a criminal offense to distribute or to reproduce copies of copyrighted works, if not authorized to do so, regardless of whether the distributor was trying to profit from the activity. The legislation was intended to fill a gap in the criminal copyright statute, highlighted in the dismissal of an indictment in United States v. LaMacchia, 871 F. Supp. 535 (D. Mass. 1994).
EXPANDED DETAILS AND DOCUMENTATION WITH TRANSCRIPTS FROM DEPOSITIONS:
Plaintiffs SCOTT BAGWELL and CINDY GREGORY conspired (CRIMINAL SOLICITATION) and schemed [18 U.S.C. 1341] with 16 yr old ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr., his parents, MARY GODDARD and JEFFERY GODDARD, and others, to hack into the Defendant's business website (a Government Witness/Informant against them), in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1030(a)(4) and 18 U.S.C. §2701(a)(2), and intercept the victim's private electronically stored Intellectual Property and communication to his attorney, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2511(a). This HACKED , STOLEN PROPERTY OBTAINED BY WIRETAP CAN NOT BE USED AS EVIDENCE PER 18 U.S.C. §2515 AND Florida State Statute 934.06. The 16yr old admitted to being out of state on vacation during part of this theft, and Plaintiffs Bagwell and Gregory, with their attorney MARC A. CHANDLER present (attorney became co-conspirator), personally admitted stealing the Defendant's Intellectual Property in their deposition. 18 U.S.C. §241
Plaintiffs also attempted to run over the defendant with their car, which, at MINIMUM, is aggravated assault - Florida State Statute 784.021, a 3rd Degree Felony. However, Davie Police covered this up, but the Defendant managed to locate their Dispatch Report. All attorneys covered this up during the trial.
To further their SCHEME, Plaintiffs Scott Bagwell and Cindy Gregory filed a BSO Police Report against the Defendant for STALKING, based on, and submitting to the Broward Sheriff's Office, the Stolen property obtained by hacking and Wiretap (BSO REPORT #BS-8-7985). One of the Plaintiffs Perjury Statements was to scheme and identify this same stolen property, which they gave to BSO at 6:30 PM, as the same property they obtained from their 16 yr old Key Witness, which was printed 3 HOURS LATER! Attorneys for both the Plaintiffs and the Defendant covered this up, and BSO Homicide Detective John Berrena, made the evidence disappear for 2 years, but accidentally put heretofore unknown property into evidence 2 YEARS LATER, after the trial.
Plaintiffs based their alleged COMPLAINT on Defamation and Mental Problems because of the above hacked and stolen Intellectual Property that they obtained by wiretap, and topped it off by stating that the Defendant allegedly videotaped their children ... But in deposition, after a page long description of exactly how the defendant allegedly videotaped their children, and held the video camera to his head above their fence, standing on a five gallon bucket, THE PLAINTIFFS, WHO HAD ALSO MADE A POLICE REPORT OF THE INCIDENT, ADMITTED THAT THEY NEVER WITNESSED THIS, AND, AS A MATTER OF FACT, STATED UNDER OATH THAT THEY WEREN'T EVEN HOME ! In addition, the Plaintiffs hired a photographer to STALK THE DEFENDANTS.
The Defendant's attorneys should have immediately sought Civil Damages for WIRETAPPING: 18 U.S.C. 2520, STALKING, Conspiracy, Malicious Prosecution, et., but refused to do so when instructed. Furthermore, the Davie Florida Police Department refused to take ANY reports in this matter, stating it was NOT a criminal matter.
Against Florida Rules Of Civil Procedure, FSS 48.031(1)(a), the Law Firm Of PAPE AND CHANDLER served Attorney LEE H. SCHILLINGER, who accepted service, and then proceeded to solicit the Defendants by telephone. ATTORNEYS JOHN A. BREKKA and LEE H. SCHILLINGER had no contract with the Defendants, and BREACHED FIDUCIARY DUTY by withholding evidence, affidavits, documentation, sharing information (including affidavits), and exculpatory information from their solicited Defendants and the Court. Schillinger's forte was Municipal Law, while Brekka's was Banking.
JUDGE HERBERT MORIARITY, knowing that the evidence against the defendant was "hacked" from his business website, refused to take MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE as required by FSS 90.201 (JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT), and allowed the Intellectual Property and Attorney-Client Privileged stolen property obtained by WIRETAP into evidence in violation of Federal Law 18 U.S.C. §2515 and State Law FSS 934.06. The Judge, himself, violated Federal Law, 18 USC 1512(a)(C). Judges are also included under "COLOR OF LAW," 18 USC 242, and thus can be prosecuted Civilly under 18 USC 1983.
Judge Herbert Moriarity REPRIMANDED attorneys MARC A. CHANDLER and LEE H. SCHILLINGER on the record for being INEFFECTIVE (transcribed excerpt from trial transcript here).
Laws were in place for competent attorneys and judges to try this case. The court, however, apparently wanted to both try and end these proceedings as soon as possible, before Thanksgiving. A parallel exculpatory Amicus Brief, applicable to this case, can be found in Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines.
The purpose of this scheme was to commit fraud and extort money from Mr. & Mrs. Phillips, who were FBI Witnesses/ Informants against the Plaintiffs, and primarily against the former owners of the Bagwell property, Selma Quintero and her husband. This is also Retaliation Of A Government Witness/Informant
The Defendant recently discovered additional EVIDENCE TAMPERING (from trial transcripts) by the Broward Sheriff's Office (BSO): BSO Tampered with Evidence. The DAVIE FLORIDA POLICE also Tampered with Evidence.
16 year old Plaintiffs' Key Witness, Robert Thomas Newton Jr. even contradicted his own Affidavit:
AFFIDAVIT - I found the victim's private electronically stored Intellectual Property and communications to his attorney 'through a 'link' on the (victim's) Home Page of his Business Website'. NEWTON also admitted his Affidavit was signed at home, 'and my mother took it to work and had a friend put her NOTARY STAMP on it'
Deposition - Contradicted his own Affidavit: "That is not exactly right. I was not prompted. I found it on my own."
Deposition - I found it through a Search Engine
Deposition - I found it by hacking
Deposition - I don't remember how I found it
SECOND DEPOSITION - "I found it using a Search Engine", and "I was OUT OF THE STATE ON VACATION."
THE DETAILS OF PLAINTIFF'S SCHEME:
Internet Search Engines do not go into unlinked subdirectories - THEY WOULD BE EXCEEDING THEIR ACCESS, A VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW (and MICROSOFT and the PENTAGON would not like it either). [18 U.S.C. 1030] {sec. (a)(4) is applicable to this case}
THE PLAINTIFFS' KEY WITNESS WAS 16 yr OLD ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr., WHO ALONG WITH HIS WITNESS FATHER, JEFFERY GODDARD, CUT THE PLAINTIFFS GRASS. NEWTON'S MOTHER, WITNESS MARY GODDARD, WROTE PLAINTIFF BAGWELL'S PAYCHECKS, AND ALL CONSPIRED WITH PLAINTIFFS AND THE LAW FIRM OF PAPE AND CHANDLER.
THE NEWTON AFFIDAVIT WAS NOT LEGALLY NOTARIZED per FSS 92.50(1). He signed his affidavit at home, and his mother, MARY GODDARD, also a Witness for the Plaintiffs, took it to work and had a friend put her NOTARY SEAL on it [Newton; Page 27, Lines 16-21].
THE JURAT, therefore, was a FRAUD UPON THE COURT, which, if rightfully challenged by a competent Defense Attorney, should have made this instrument void and inadmissible. This fact was concealed by the attorneys for both sides (EVIDENCE/WITNESS TAMPERING by ATTORNEYS LEE H. SCHILLINGER and MARC A. CHANDLER).
The NOTARY also became a party to this conspiracy.
ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr. PERJURED and INCRIMINATED himself by stating that he hacked into the defendant's business website on FRIDAY, AUGUST 15, at 3:00 AM, all by himself, at the request of Plaintiff Cindy Carol Gregory, using a Search Engine. [Newton; p20:9-25]
Plaintiff CINDY CAROL GREGORY Perjured herself in deposition by saying she never asked Bobby to obtain anything from the defendant's website [Gregory; p109:13-19], even though she stated so in a BSO Police Report, and Robert Thomas Newton Jr. confirmed this in his 2nd Deposition by Attorney Mark Grossman. {contradiction}
Moments later, ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr. testified to HACKING, using different addresses [Newton; p21:6-19] a violation of 18 U.S.C. §1030(a)(4) {contradiction} {Unauthorized Access (HACKING)}
Moments later, ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON reverted back to testifying he had used a Search Engine [Newton; p22:7-23] {contradiction}
Moments later, after an objection by Plaintiffs Attorney, MARC A. CHANDLER, ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr. has a memory lapse, and can't remember how he found it [Newton; p23:6] {contradiction}
ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr. then stated that HE gave the website "address" (alpha-numeric password) to Plaintiff Scott Bagwell [Newton; p23:20] (to cover why Plaintiffs were in possession of the Internet Address and sub-directory information). Unfortunately NEWTON just admitted to another Federal Crime, [18 USC 1030 (a)(6),(a)&(b)], trafficking in passwords. {contradiction}
Moments later, the Defendants, who had not received affidavits (attorneys withheld them until after the trial), listened to ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON testify that the content of his ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT, was written by Attorney MARC A. CHANDLER, and KEY WITNESS ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON, WHOM THIS TRIAL CENTERED AROUND, PROCEEDED TO CONTRADICT HIS OWN AFFIDAVIT. Again, the Plaintiffs Action should have ended, but the attorneys continued to STIR UP STRIFE. {major contradiction} {FRAUD UPON THE COURT} {FRAUD UPON THE DEFENDANTS} {MALICIOUS PROSECUTION} {WITNESS TAMPERING}
ATTORNEYS JOHN A. BREKKA and LEE H. SCHILLINGER HAD NO COMPETANT KNOWLEDGE OF INTERNET PROTOCOL OR EXPERT GRASP OF INTERNET LAW, HIRED NO EXPERT WITNESS FOR THIS AREA, WERE INEFFECTIVE, ACCORDING TO JUDGE HERBERT MORIARITY, on behalf of the Court (WHO SHOULD HAVE STOPPED THE TRIAL when the bench took notice and chastised both attorneys ON THE RECORD), REFUSED TO USE EXCULPATORY INFORMATION FROM THE GROSSMAN DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFFS' KEY WITNESS, AND AIDED AND ABETTED THE PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR ATTORNEY TO COMMIT "FRAUD UPON THE COURT," FRAUD UPON THE DEFENANTS, AND PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, A CLEAR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS THEY ALLEGEDLY REPRESENTED.
To play their game in this FRAUDULENT AND MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTED TRIAL, WITH THESE INCOMPETENT ATTORNEYS, I needed to have ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr. testify that he positively "found" this non-linked, Stored Information/In Transit Communication On A Protected Computer, using a Search Engine, since I was in contacted the Counsel for YAHOO.COM, and had the website LOG FILES of exactly what the INKTOMI Spiders collected when Mike had my website run.
Again, the Defendant's Attorneys, LEE H. SCHILLINGER and JOHN A. BREKKA, would NOT COOPERATE, and would not even return telephone calls or faxes.
In his 2nd Deposition by Internet Law Attorney Specialist, MARK GROSSMAN, ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr. positively stated that he "found" the Stolen Intellectual Property through a search engine. Internet Search Engines do not go into unlinked subdirectories - THEY WOULD BE EXCEEDING THEIR ACCESS, A VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW (plus MICROSOFT and the PENTAGON would not like it). [18 U.S.C. 1030] The PLAINTIFFS' ACTION should have ended at this point.
Attorney LEE H. SCHILLINGER and JOHN A. BREKKA, who kept sending invoices, wanted to keep the Plaintiffs Action going, and refused to use anything from the Grossman deposition, a blatant BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY.
ATTORNEY LEE H. SCHILLINGER actually yelled at the Defendant, and hung up the phone in Defendant's ear for using THE LAW FIRM OF BECKER AND POLIAKOFF FOR A 2nd DEPOSITION OF NEWTON, AFTER FINDING HIS WEBSITE, IN WHICH HE LISTED HIS RATES FOR WRITING WEB PAGES. SCHILLINGER stated that he had lost a case to THE LAW FIRM OF BECKER AND POLIAKOFF, AND THAT THE DEFENDANT SHOULD GO BACK AND DEMAND HIS MONEY BACK, BECAUSE SCHILLINGER STATED TO DEFENDANT THAT HE REFUSED TO USE ANYTHING FROM THAT DEPOSITION.
Defendant then called ATTORNEY ALLEN BECKER of the Law Firm of BECKER AND POLIAKOFF, and ATTORNEY ALLEN BECKER confirmed this as fact. Schillinger refused to take my calls after that, stating: "Wasn't I good enough for you?"
SINCE DEFENDANTS HAD NO CONTRACT WITH ATTORNEYS LEE H. SCHILLINGER AND/OR JOHN A. BREKKA, AND THEY SOLICITED THE DEFENDANT, DID THEY HAVE A FIDUCIARY DUTY TO EFFECTIVELY REPRESENT THE DEFENDANTS, WHO THEY WERE INVOICING? SINCE THEY DIDN'T BOTHER WITH A CONTRACT, WAS I TECHNICALLY EVEN THEIR CLIENT? THEY DID NOT HIRE AN EXPERT WITNESS FOR THE INTERNET, WHICH WAS WHAT THIS CASE WAS ABOUT (HACKING). INSTEAD, THEY WOULD ASK THE DEFENDANT QUESTIONS, MANY OF WHICH HE KNEW LITTLE OR NOTHING ABOUT.
These "attorneys" certainly did NOT do anything, except withhold the plaintiff's letter (per trial transcripts) affidavits, and virtually all damaging evidence from the court AND their own Defendants, who were told by the FBI not to disclose anything that was discussed with the FBI about the people involved (PLAINTIFFS). IT'S AS IF THEY PURPOSELY WANTED THEIR DEFENDANTS TO LOSE.
FURTHER, DID THE LAW FIRM OF BECKER AND POLIAKOFF HAVE A FIDUCIARY DUTY TO NOTIFY THE COURT THAT THE ACTION BEFORE THE COURT WAS BASED ON FRAUD?
Plaintiffs' attorney had to say he couldn't decide, because he had nothing to cover his tail and that of his Plaintiffs, Bagwell and Gregory, since I had discovered Newton was OUT OF STATE. This meant that BAGWELL AND GREGORY WERE THE REAL HACKERS, a fact that Cindy C. Gregory had already admitted to in Deposition [Gregory; page125, Lines 17 to 19] , which was quickly concealed by attorneys for the Plaintiff and Defendant, who were all working together. {conspiracy] {contradiction} {FRAUD}
Attorney Lee H. Schillinger verbally acknowledged that Plaintiffs did their own hacking to Defendant and his Wife at Schillinger's Office, then produced a copy of a letter to an attorney from me, stating that this letter was "found" during discovery (but withheld from Defendants). This was attorney-client privileged property, stolen from the Defendant's website through unauthorized access.
Schillinger then AGAIN refused to contact the judge. Defendant contacted Chief Judge Dale Ross's Office for Schillinger's committing a Fraud Upon The Court by concealing Federal Crimes, and was told to contact Judge Herbert Moriarity's Office. Moriarity's Office reply: "Tell it to the BAR." In effect, Judge Herbert Moriarity's Office violated Federal Law, 18 USC 1512(a)(C), by refusing to take MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE. His Office forced me accept the verdict, even though State and Federal Laws had been broken, and all attorneys in this trial had "UNCLEAN HANDS."
ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr. stated in deposition [Newton; p35:14-22] that he made printouts of the HACKED Intellectual Property on FRIDAY, AUGUST 15, at 10:19 PM in the evening, and gave them to Plaintiffs Bagwell and Gregory, who then gave them to BSO at 6:30 PM the same day, 3 hours BEFORE THEY WERE PRINTED. {contradiction}
Plaintiff Cindy Gregory PERJURED herself in deposition by stating she was contacted on the morning of THURSDAY, AUGUST 14, 1997 and then had a conversation at a restaurant that evening, in which Gregory talked to Bobby's Mother, a conversation NOT directly with Bobby, and Bobby (a.k.a. ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr."), "just happened to volunteer to go look for it" (HACK into a website) [Gregory; p110:12-p112:21] {contradiction}
ON FRIDAY, AUGUST 15, 1997, at 6:30 PM, PLAINTIFFS SCOTT BAGWELL AND CINDY GREGORY FILED A POLICE REPORT WITH BSO. PLAINTIFF GREGORY STATES THAT JODI NEEDLES CONTACTED HER ON THE MORNING OF FRIDAY, AUGUST 15, 1997, AND PLAINTIFF CINDY CAROL GREGORY THEN CALLED A "FRIEND" TO "PULL UP" THE WEBSITE. PLAINTIFFS' KEY WITNESS, 16 yr old ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr., ADMITTED HE WAS THAT "FRIEND," IN HIS SECOND DEPOSITION by Internet Law Specialist, ATTORNEY MARK GROSSMAN. THIS NOT ONLY CONTRADICTS GREGORY'S DEPOSITION THAT SHE DID NOT ASK NEWTON, IT ALSO CONTRADICTS NEWTON'S DEPOSITION THAT HE FOUND IT BY HIMSELF AT 3 AM, AFTER HOURS OF HACKING AND SEARCHING. {contradiction} {incrimination} {conspiracy}
Plaintiffs SCOTT BAGWELL and CINDY GREGORY apparently forgot to tell their star 16 yr old witness, ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr. that they filed a BSO Police Report at 6:30 PM on August 15, 1997, which included the printouts allegedly made by ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr. AT 10:19 PM >>>3 hours AFTER the report was actually made<<<. {contradiction}
PLAINTIFF CINDY GREGORY IDENTIFIED THESE SAME PRINTOUTS AS THE "ORIGINALS" THAT SHE OBTAINED FROM "BOBBY" (a.k.a. ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr.), THUS COMPLETING A CHAIN OF CUSTODY WITH AN IMPOSSIBLE TIMELINE. [Gregory; p124:19-p125:16] {VERY BIG CONTRADICTION}
Plaintiff attempted to Defame/ Slander/ the Defendant to make defendant look as bad as possible, in their BSO Police Report. Plaintiffs stated that they were being stalked by stating (AND ACTUALLY GIVING THE STATUTORY WORDING) in Paragraph 1 of their Police Narrative, later contradicting herself that she didn't.
Plaintiff Gregory also stated that "DEFENDANT /OFFENDER APPROACHED THEM" and handed them material prior to the sale of their house. Plaintiffs later wrote a hateful NOTARIZED LETTER to Defendants, accidentally telling the truth in great detail that THEY requested the information, and went over to a neighbor's house, and had her disturb Defendants by calling us on the telephone. PLAINTIFFS further acknowledge ENCROACHMENTS to Defendant's property PRIOR to the purchase of their house. {contradiction} {Acknowledgement of DEFECT IN TITLE in last line on page 1 of Plaintiffs NOTARIZED LETTER}
The Plaintiffs and their witnesses couldn't even keep their stories straight. A password was given to Ms. Jodi Needles of the "Sun Sentinel Newspaper," along with copyright permission for use of a specific PICTURE, on the condition that it be used only for COPYING OF A SPECIFIC PICTURE, AND USE OF SAID PICTURE BY THE SUN SENTINEL NEWSPAPER, relating to the flooding of my property caused by Bagwell. I was approached by Reporter Jodi Needles, (who was latter slammed for inaccurate reporting by DAVIE Mayor, Harry Venis) after a code hearing at the Davie Town Hall.
It appears the SUN SENTINEL reporter wanted to "STIR UP STRIFE," and profit by the story it created as it unfolded. This is NOT reporting a story; it is CREATING ONE, AND ALSO CREATING STRIFE, which is NOT covered by the FIRST AMENDMENT.
Because there were so many CONTRADICTIONS in their Depositions, plus the 3 hour DISCREPANCY in time of the printouts, the evidence had to "disappear." BSO Detective John Berrena removed all evidence for 2 years, yet finally returned my call using a "phone patch." Since I had also performed communications work for BSO years earlier, I noted the phone number he was calling from that came through my Caller-ID. (Please note the lack of Chain of Custody dates and signatures on the custody sheets, but TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS STATE THE EVIDENCE WAS MISSING).
BSO DETECTIVE JOHN BERRENA REALLY GOOFED: A third group of evidence, heretofore unknown to exist, and not disclosed in Discovery or deposition or Police Report, and for which their is no accounting for, or "CHAIN OF CUSTODY," was also put into evidence for the first time, by BSO DETECTIVE JOHN BERRENA, along with the rest of the evidence he removed 2 years earlier. THIS PROPERTY, MARKED AS "SAFEKEEPING," HAD IN INTAKE DATE OF 8-15-97, AND A PROPERTY NUMBER OF "99-", INDICATING IT WASN'T CHECKED IN UNTIL THE YEAR 1999, AFTER THE TRIAL. BSO CORRUPTION AND CONSPIRACY?
BSO Detective JOHN BERRENA returned all evidence AFTER THE TRIAL of his friends, but perhaps didn't realize this extra batch he concealed was NOT part of the original evidence that he had removed in December of 1997!
DETECTIVE JOHN BERRENA did not check this heretofore unknown property into the evidence room until 2 years after he received it, and months after the trial ended. {Evidence Tampering by BSO Detective JOHN BERRENA, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2071}
HOW COULD ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON PRINT SOMETHING OUT AT 10:19 PM IN THE EVENING, AND THE PLAINTIFFS GIVE IT TO THE POLICE AT 6:30 PM, 3 HOURS BEFORE HE ALLEGEDLY PRINTED IT OUT? TIME MACHINE? OR DID IT HAVE TO BE EDITED BY THE PLAINTIFFS FIRST?
ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr. STATED 'HE THOUGHT LESS OF THE PLAINTIFFS', THUS MAKING THE PLAINTIFFS' CASE FOR LIBEL. THEN HE WENT SCUBA-DIVING AT THE PLAINTIFFS' HOUSE, ALONG WITH OTHER WITNESSES / CONSPIRATORS !
Plaintiff SCOTT KEVIN BAGWELL TAMPERED WITH WITNESSES, which was reported to Attorney LEE H. SCHILLINGER, who promptly did NOTHING.
TO STIR UP STRIFE for Defendants, Attorneys LEE H. SCHILLINGER and MARC A. CHANDLER also Tampered With Evidence by withholding facts from the Court that Plaintiff CINDY CAROL GREGORY had MODIFIED, stolen, Intellectual Property in her possession at the time of her deposition, and further that the stolen, modified property being dated AUGUST 20, 1997, while 16 yr old key witness HACKER ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr. was on vacation, OUT OF STATE. (per his 2nd deposition).
Plaintiff CINDY CAROL GREGORY admitted in her deposition that the both PLAINTIFFS AND the 16 yr old HACKER stole the remaining Property from the Defendant's website (with dates other than August 15, 1997). This is important because this was an alleged DEFAMATION Case, and the Plaintiffs admit supplying their own (STOLEN) evidence, including during the timeline when their 16 yr old HACKER "friend" admitted being OUT OF STATE in his 2nd Deposition.
Attorneys LEE H. SCHILLINGER, JOHN A. BREKKA, and MARC A. CHANDLER conspired with Plaintiffs SCOTT K. BAGWELL AND CINDY C. GREGORY, who conspired with BROWARD SHERIFF'S OFFICE DETECTIVE JOHN BERRENA and DAVIE POLICE OFFICER RICHARD JANSEN to conceal facts (EVIDENCE TAMPERING) from the Court in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2071
JUDGE HERBERT MORIARITY, knowing that the evidence against the defendant was "hacked" from his business website, did not take MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE (JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT), but allowed the Intellectual Property and Attorney-Client Privileged stolen property into evidence in violation of State and Federal Law, 18 U.S.C. §2515 .
While Attorney General Janet Reno prosecuted a 16 year old HACKER from Miami, Florida, Judge Herbert Moriarity was UNLAWFULLY and NEGLIGENTLY busy awarding Scott Kevin Bagwell and Cindy Carol Gregory 10s of thousands as a reward for their fraudulent scheme.
The audio you hear on this website is threats made by Plaintiff SCOTT K. BAGWELL, and was recorded over a year before the trial. ATTORNEYS LEE H. SCHILLINGER, JOHN A. BREKKA, AND MARC A. CHANDLER concealed this evidence from the Court, to falsely make the Plaintiffs appear to be the victims.
Scott Kevin Bagwell, a timeshare salesman, has "friends" at the Davie Police Department and the Broward Sheriff's Office (BSO). Both Davie Police and BSO Tampered with Evidence. Attorney MARC A. CHANDLER fraudulently manufactured evidence for the plaintiffs, because I later discovered that their 16 yr old witness was on vacation, out of state.
Judge Herbert Moriarity chastised all attorneys, acknowledging on record that Defendants did not have effective counsel. This same judge later ruled that the Defendant had a "Verbal Contingency Agreement" (which is illegal) with the same attorney he stated was "unprepared."
This case is similar to the 16 yr old Miami HACKER, the Bloomberg Case, the Juvenile HACKER case, and other Cyber-Crime Cases.
======== STALKING OF DEFENDANTS by PLAINTIFFS ========
Scott Bagwell and Cindy Gregory, who admit having 1" Ziplick Baggies 'all over their house' and sending friends in an SUV to shine their headlights on the house of the Government Witnesses/Informants against them (STALKING), conspired with 16 yr old HACKER, ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr. who cut their lawn, and with an unscrupulous lawyer, MARC A. CHANDLER, and proceeded to maliciously bring suit against their stalked victims.
The case against the stalked victim's wife was based on the plaintiffs' statement that the wife should be sued for allegedly making the gesture made to us in the two photographs above by plaintiff Scott Kevin Bagwell, together with other false and malicious contradictory statements, which caused Co-Plaintiff Cindy Carol Gregory great pain and suffering (per deposition and trial transcripts), and as also set forth in affidavit by "Attorney" Marc A. Chandler, who manufactured evidence.
The case against the husband was based on a hidden subdirectory on a protected computer, not available to the general public or search engine, that the Plaintiffs themselves hacked into. The husband kept this Intellectual Property / stored communication in a secure subdirectory of his business website for another attorney to view. Both the Husband and Wife were FBI Informants/Witnesses against the Plaintiffs and the former owner of the house, a Deported Columbian Alien, according to the FBI and DEA.
How secure were these hidden subdirectories? The defendant had such a great expectation of privacy that he kept back-up copies of his business files and financial spreadsheets (per trial transcripts), a fact withheld by the attorneys who solicited him.
Scott Kevin Bagwell, a timeshare salesman, has "friends" at the Davie Police Department and the Broward Sheriff's Office (BSO). Both Davie Police and BSO Tampered with Evidence. Attorney MARC A. CHANDLER fraudulently manufactured evidence for the plaintiffs, because I later discovered that their 16 yr old witness was on vacation, out of state.
The subdirectory also included references to perjury by a Town Of Davie Code Enforcement Officer. Attorney Marc A. Chandler, looking for a quick buck, also conspired with 16 yr old hacker ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr., who also removed a copy of a letter from the husband to another attorney, a violation of attorney-client privilege, and a FEDERAL WIRETAPPING OFFENSE.
Hours after his first deposition, I was called by telephone by a police officer and told that ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr. and other co-conspirators were at plaintiff Bagwell's residence. Bagwell didn't get home until much later. Parties scuba diving in Bagwell included Key Witness Robert Thomas Newton Jr. and his step-father, Jeffery Goddard (who together with his wife, Mary Goddard, signed affidavits that their son hacked into a protected computer), and Bagwell's friend, Dean Seymour, who Bagwell mentioned during the trial. All these people, who supposedly didn't know each other, just happened to go swimming at the Plaintiff's house while he wasn't home. What a coincidence. CAUGHT IN THE ACT, but concealed by all attorneys.
Since this incident of HACKING is a federal offense (18 U.S.C. §2701(a)(2)), and further involved Wiretap Laws (18 U.S.C. § 2511 (1) (a),(c),(d),(e) this case should have never gone to court, but Judge Herbert Moriarity did NOT do his job, and UNLAWFULLY allowed the stolen property and letter to an attorney into evidence against Federal Law 18 U.S.C. § 2515. This private Intellectual Property included information on the defendant's correspondence with the FBI, Perjury by the Town Of Davie, and the Illegal purchase of a house by Scott K. Bagwell from the wife of a Deported Columbian Alien. All reference to the unlawful purchase had been removed.
Attorneys LEE H. SCHILLINGER and JOHN A. BREKKA were working for the plaintiffs and their attorney, MARC A. CHANDLER, and CHANDLER SERVED THEM, NOT THE DEFENDANT. MARC A. CHANDLER actually picked the attorneys for the defendants, without their knowledge.
Attorney LEE H. SCHILLINGER and JOHN A. BREKKA accepted service without permission of the Defendants, THEN solicited the Defendants by telephone.
recap:
ATTORNEYS LEE H. SCHILLINGER AND JOHN A. BREKKA REFUSED TO USE EVIDENCE GATHERED BY ATTORNEY MARK GROSSMAN, OF THE LAW FIRM OF BECKER AND POLIAKOFF, WHOM I PERSONALLY HIRED FOR A SECOND DEPOSITION OF ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr. (EVIDENCE TAMPERING BY ATTORNEYS).
ALSO, WAS THE LAW FIRM OF BECKER AND POLIAKOFF LIABLE FOR NOT MAKING THIS FRAUD UPON THE COURT KNOWN?
THIS SECOND DEPOSITION REVEALED THAT ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr. PERJURED HIMSELF IN HIS AFFIDAVIT AND IN HIS FIRST DEPOSITION, BECAUSE I DISCOVERED A POLICE REPORT MADE TO THE BROWARD SHERIFF'S OFFICE, IN WHICH THE PLAINTIFFS STATE THAT THEY CALLED "A FRIEND," (ROBERT THOMAS NEWTON Jr. admitted in deposition to being that "friend") ON THE MORNING OF AUGUST 15, 1997, AND ASKED HIM TO HACK INTO DEFENDANT'S WEBSITE, AND HE HAD COPIES READY FOR THEM. THE KID ALSO ACKNOWLEDGED THAT HE "WROTE WEB PAGES" AND HAD HIS OWN WEBSITE, AND WAS OUT OF STATE ON VACATION WHEN EVIDENCE WAS SUBMITTED (SUPPOSEDLY BY HIM). ATTORNEY MARC A. CHANDLER WAS PRESENT FOR THIS DAMAGING DEPOSITION, BUT STILL WENT FORWARD WITH THIS "FRAUD UPON THE COURT," AND WENT BEFORE THE COURT WITH "UNCLEAN HANDS."
THIS CONTRADICTS HIS AFFIDAVIT, THE AFFIDAVIT OF HIS FATHER, JEFFERY GODDARD, AND THE AFFIDAVIT OF HIS BIRTH MOTHER, MARY GODDARD, WHO JUST HAPPENS TO WRITE PLAINTIFF SCOTT KEVIN BAGWELL'S PAYCHECKS.
The defendants called Head Judge Dale Ross's office about these attorneys, and were told to contact Judge Herbert Moriarity, but Moriarity wouldn't even listen.
These attorneys even "double billed" the defendants, and then persuaded Judge Herbert Moriarity to collect for their unlawful acts by stating that they had an illegal "VERBAL CONTINGENCY AGREEMENT." JUDGE HERBERT MORIARITY CONSPIRED WITH ATTORNEY LEE H. SCHILLINGER TO THIS UNLAWFUL ACT.
The trial itself can be considered "stalking," especially since their alleged witness was OUT OF STATE part of the time, and could not have done all the HACKING himself. Plaintiff CINDY GREGORY also admitted that the PLAINTIFFS did their own HACKING.
The Plaintiffs continue to stalk the victim and his family, and their children, BUT BROWARD COUNTY JUDGES WILL NOT ISSUE A RESTRAINING ORDER.
This is not just a true story, this is the way we live our lives, never knowing what to expect next. Will Bagwell make another prank call to DCF, and have them show up at our door again? It happened more than once. He's also called Code enforcement, and we had to file a perjury report against the Code Inspector. Will we be accused of something else, and have the Police show up again? Will we have another dog poisoned?
This is what stalking really is - you constantly live in fear, because you don't know what's going to happen next.
ACCORDING TO INTERNET NEWSGROUPS, "SCOTT BAGWELL" IS WELL KNOWN FOR POT and his BONG.
A more detailed version can be found at HERE and some of the highlights of the true story of how these people have stalked our family, including our toddler, can be found HERE
THE LEGAL RESEARCH WAS DONE SOLELY BY THE DEFENDANT, AND MAY NOT BE USED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION.
COPYRIGHT© 2003
|
